Let me preface this entire post by saying that losing sucks, and losing to Iowa State sucks worse than most. I never want Iowa to lose a game against anyone, and it is never fun when it happens.
With that said, I’m not that pissed that Iowa fell to Iowa State on Saturday.
Don’t get me wrong, there are some things I am pissed about:
I’m also upset that Iowa played for overtime at the end of regulation. Before you say it, I know what you’re thinking. That’s Kirk Ferentz, they’ve won plenty of games playing that way, and it will never change. That’s fine, and I’ll take the good with the bad, but I see a difference between the situation at Ohio State in 2009 and the situation Saturday in Ames . That’s all I have to say about that.
Here’s why I’m not as mad as I should be: I like Iowa State .
I like the coach, the players, the uniforms, the stadium with the new video board, and (most of all) the people who are close to the program. It’s hard to be mad when people you like are happy. I’m glad that the players got to experience the satisfaction of taking down a rival. I feel like Coach Rhoads deserved that win. I loved hearing John Walters’ call of the game-winning touchdown and the post game call in show with Chris Williams. They beat my team, but they did it legitimately and with class, and that’s a loss I can handle.
Most importantly, that game was good for the rivalry. I wont go as far as to say it was “needed”, because it has been a back and forth rivalry ever since Iowa’s streak of 15 straight was snapped in 1998 (had to throw that in). Andy Fales put it best on Sunday night’s SoundOff on TV 13: a rivalry is like a pendulum, and if it doesn’t swing both ways it stops. That game swung the pendulum further in the other direction than it has been in a long time. It was no fluke, and the outcome was uncertain until the last play. That’s what a real rivalry game should be.
And it’s not like we lost to Nebraska .
Logical post, and no offense taken. Two points, however.
ReplyDelete1) You can't say that Cyclones take the game more seriously when your opening paragraph states that you hate losing to Iowa State even more than just losing a game.
2) Steele Jantz did not defeat Vandenberg. The Cyclones, defeated the Hawkeyes. It was not 1-on-1. Steele Jantz is an exciting player who made big plays, but he did not win the game. He led a team of players to victory.
I don't believe I ever said the Cyclones took the game more seriously or that it was a one-on-one battle. I said Jantz was the better quarterback, and that is hard to argue against.
ReplyDeleteTrue, I've never heard you say we took the game more seriously, but you have to admit, it's a common argument.
ReplyDeleteTrue. Anyway, good post, and thanks for giving us credit.